Democratic Peace and Externalized Accountability: Alliance Commitment beyond Institutions in NATO and the Indo-Pacific > Journal

본문 바로가기

Journal

[2026 MAR Vol.1 No.1] Democratic Peace and Externalized Accountability: Alliance Commitment beyond Institutions in NATO and the Indo-Pacific

master
2026-03-31 11:45 747 0

본문

Title Democratic Peace and Externalized Accountability: Alliance Commitment beyond Institutions in NATO and the Indo-Pacific
Abstract

Why does peace among democracies persist in form yet erode in substance? This article argues that democratic peace has become a managed condition rather than an automatic byproduct of shared regime type – one increasingly dependent on alliance governance practices that classical domesticcentered accounts cannot explain. The article introduces ‘externalized accountability’– the degree to which democratic restraint and reassurance are produced through system-level alliance practices rather than domestic institutions alone – and operationalizes it through three observable indicators: commitment predictability, reassurance conditionality, and deterrence integration. Using comparative process tracing across NATO’s institutionalized multilateralism in Europe and minilateral security networks in the Indo-Pacific, the study shows that both settings reveal convergent limits: institutions buffer divergence and absorb shocks, but cannot substitute for integrated political commitment that credible deterrence requires. From Georgia to Ukraine, NATO’s institutional density sustained internal cohesion while externalized accountability eroded at the alliance’s eastern perimeter. In the Indo-Pacific, the Quad and the U.S.-ROK-Japan trilateral generated measurable signaling value while structural divergences – India’s strategic autonomy and the fragility of Seoul-Tokyo bilateral trust – imposed a ceiling on deterrence integration that no institutional design could dissolve. Democratic peace persists as the absence of war, but its qualitative depth increasingly hinges on whether democratic allies treat their security obligations as shared and indivisible rather than conditional and negotiable. This analysis extends democratic peace theory beyond its domestic focus, generates testable predictions for alliance credibility under stress, and yields concrete implications for alliance governance design.

Issue Year 2026
Issue Month MAR
Volume 1
Number 1
Publisher name Korea University Peace & Democracy Institute
Journal Peace & Democracy
Author Shin-wha Lee
Contents

The Issue

Democratic Peace Revisited: From Domestic Constraints to Systemic Accountability

NATO’s Institutional Density and the Limits of Collective Commitment: Deterrence toward Russia 

Minilateral Density Without Collective Commitment: Indo-Pacific Cases

Keywords democratic peace, externalized accountability, alliance governance, deterrence credibility, minilateralism, NATO vs. Indo-Pacific
PDF File
PD26Mar_73_89_Lee_260323.pdf (100.9K) - Download
Attached File (Cover image)
창간호-표지사진_800_1070.png (365.3K) - Download
게시판 전체검색